Not in My Book places academic rivalry inside a graduate writing workshop. Rosie Maxwell wants to write romance; Aiden Huntington dismisses the happy endings she values. Their arguments endanger their place in class, and a compulsory joint manuscript gives them a new way to communicate. Choose this when the process of writing together is as appealing as the eventual attraction.
The book divides inspected critics over the credibility of its antagonism and later conflict. Supportive reviewers enjoy discovering feelings through fictional scenes, while Publishers Weekly finds the behavior immature. This researched assessment treats the NYU MFA setting as a direct academic fit and explains the disagreement without converting promotional comparisons or store averages into quality evidence.
A selective recommendation for romance readers who enjoy combative writers revealing themselves through a shared manuscript. The book-within-a-book offers a strong hook, but exaggerated hostility and the later romantic rupture are material limitations.
Provisional Eikna score: 3.4/5. Four core dimensions cover 85% of the quality weight. Ending satisfaction and reread appeal remain unscored; heat is excluded. Researched editorial assessment; no firsthand reading claimed. Evidence confidence: moderate.
A numeric heat level has not been established. Read the review’s heat and content discussion for attributed descriptions before choosing. An unknown level is not a closed-door or no-spice promise.
The heat-level guide explains detail and frequency; the glossary entry for spice separates sexual content from quality.
The romantic outcome is not established in this summary. A romance label does not independently confirm an ending. Consult the discussion before choosing if closure is essential.
For the difference between romantic commitment and wider plot closure, compare HEA, HFN and cliffhangers.
Standalone or continuing-series status is not established in this summary. Read the existing format and series guidance for any available context; do not assume a missing series entry means the book stands alone.
The series-order guide explains what to check when a complete romance belongs to a connected world.
| Title | Not in My Book |
|---|---|
| Author | Katie Holt |
| Inspected edition | US paperback · ISBN 9781639109753 |
| Publication scope | Published 10 December 2024 · checked 11 October 2026 |
| ISBN-13 | 9781639109753 |
| Edition page count | 336 pages |
The author or publisher evidence identifies the work. Publication dates refer to the stated edition or release scope, not automatically the first appearance of the story. Unknown identifiers and formats are left open.
Rosie leaves Tennessee for New York to pursue writing. Her former crush Aiden becomes a workshop opponent because their literary values clash. The publisher makes the forced collaboration explicit: to remain in class, they must combine their preferred genres in one novel.
Publishers Weekly identifies the program as an NYU MFA. This is graduate-student rivalry, distinct from school rankings, a professor/student romance or professional coworkers. Neither protagonist's exact age is established in the inspected sources. Competing ambitions matter alongside the initial disagreement about what stories deserve respect.
The publisher describes the joint novel as a space for disclosures they struggle to make directly. Kenn at Novelistic Pages finds that Rosie's single viewpoint creates anticipation around Aiden, while his contributions to their fictional story offer another route into his feelings. The appeal depends on enjoying that indirect conversation.
A critical StoryGraph listener, loserlew, also appreciates exchanges through the shared document. That praise matters because it survives a largely negative response. The device can work even when a reader rejects other elements. Publishers Weekly likewise enjoys the embedded story while finding the surrounding romantic antics excessive.
Sandy at Somewhere Only We Know finds tension in Aiden learning to write romance, but also objects to Rosie's resistance to literary stories with unresolved or unhappy conclusions. That gives the disagreement two sides: defending a favorite genre can become dismissing someone else's work.
Kenn starts out irritated by Rosie and later finds her development convincing. The StoryGraph listener instead objects to familiar Tennessee stereotypes, and the trade review finds Rosie's reactions inflated. Readers looking for nuanced cultural or regional characterization should weigh those objections alongside the publisher's identification of Rosie as Peruvian American.
Sandy enjoys the heated dialogue but notices a possible inconsistency in a writing phrase Aiden criticizes and subsequently uses. Kenn praises the humor and prose. These observations support an energetic reading experience while leaving room to question the finish of individual scenes.
GoodeyReads enjoys the gradual movement from hostility to intimacy and the New York holiday atmosphere. Its reviewer also finds some sexual content excessive for their taste. A readers' discussion on RomanceBooks reports a difficult opening followed by much stronger engagement; another participant rejects the classroom feud and thin characterization. Neither reaction represents a population-wide verdict.
Kenn regards Aiden's conduct during the third-act breakup as inconsistent enough to damage an otherwise favorable response. GoodeyReads expects trouble from the setup and finds the grand gesture easier to accept. The distinction is useful: anticipating a rupture does not guarantee that its execution will feel earned.
This review avoids detailing the rupture, but it cannot recommend the novel as a no-third-act-breakup option. Readers who need durable trust and convincing repair may prefer to investigate that issue before buying. Ending satisfaction remains unscored because the inspected responses do not establish a sufficiently clear, shared assessment of the resolution.
Independent reviewers report explicit sexual scenes. GoodeyReads identifies open-door content and finds some of it too much for their taste; Sandy discusses an intense jointly written scene. A numeric heat level, scene count and precise timing remain unverified. Graduate-school setting does not by itself establish the characters’ exact ages or a suitability recommendation. GoodeyReads supplied-copy criticism. Somewhere Only We Know: Sandy, supplied-copy criticism. Novelistic Pages: Kenn, ARC criticism.
GoodeyReads reports recounted parental loss and moderate language. Kenn and GoodeyReads discuss a third-act breakup; the trade review describes repeated hostile classroom exchanges. These are selected content notes, not a complete warning audit. The sources do not establish absence of cheating, coercion or other sensitive subjects. GoodeyReads supplied-copy criticism. Novelistic Pages: Kenn, ARC criticism. Publishers Weekly trade criticism.
Best for writing workshops, reluctant collaboration and a defense of romance as a genre. Approach cautiously if you need emotionally restrained protagonists, believable classroom conduct or a relationship without a third-act breakup.
The most useful disagreement concerns execution rather than whether the premise is recognizably romantic. The trade critic dislikes exaggerated enemies-to-lovers behavior, whereas supportive ARC reviewers enjoy the tension and manuscript device. A critical audiobook listener values the collaborative conversations but dislikes regional characterization. Selected Reddit testimony ranges from growing investment after a rough start to rejecting the pairing. No current community average, popularity claim or consensus is inferred from this small evidence set.
Purchases through Amazon, Bookshop.org and Libro.fm links may earn us a commission. As an Amazon Associate, Eikna Romance earns from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.
The verified edition is the Alcove Press US paperback, published 10 December 2024, ISBN 9781639109753, with 336 pages on the current publisher and Bookshop listings. The older trade and ARC records give 320 pages; they do not override this edition record. A Kirkus audiobook review identifies Frankie Corzo, Recorded Books, 11 hours 30 minutes and a 2024 release. Series position and a precise HEA/HFN ending remain unknown. Amazon, Audible and Libro destinations are held because the attempted exact product pages did not return inspectable identity; price, stock and subscription access are not claimed.
A direct US product edition has not been verified. The Amazon link is a title-and-author search, with no specific format or availability promised.
We may earn a commission from purchases through our links, at no extra cost to you. Search Amazon for the title and author.
The inspected Bookshop.org product is Paperback. Its title, author and ISBN 9781639109753 were checked; current price and stock are not established.
Disabled actions mean the exact destination has not been verified, not that a format is unavailable. Confirm the selected edition and format before purchasing.
Quality scale: 1 substantial weaknesses; 2 weaknesses outweigh strengths; 3 mixed; 4 strengths outweigh limitations; 5 exceptional sustained strengths. Half points are allowed. Weights: romance 30%, characters 20%, writing 20%, emotional impact 15%, ending satisfaction 10%, reread appeal 5%. A provisional overall score divides the supported weighted sum by its supported weight and rounds once to one decimal. Heat is descriptive and excluded. These scores express the evidence-based judgment explained in this review.
The shared manuscript is appealing, while hostile behavior and repair divide critics.
Provisional dimension score: 3.5/5.
Defensible ambitions, with disputed maturity and regional detail.
Provisional dimension score: 3/5.
Energetic meta-fiction with limitations in polish and behavior.
Provisional dimension score: 3.5/5.
Intimacy can develop convincingly, but a difficult turn limits the recommendation.
Provisional dimension score: 3.5/5.
Explicit content reported; numeric level unknown.
Unscored; conflict reception is retained separately.
Unscored; enjoyment and rereading are different evidence.
Yes. The protagonists are NYU MFA writing students whose workshop conflict leads to mandatory collaboration.
The inspected evidence identifies graduate students. It does not establish either character’s exact age or a professor/student pairing.
Independent reviewers report explicit sexual scenes. A precise numeric heat level remains unknown.
Yes, independent reviewers explicitly discuss it and disagree about its effectiveness.
The US Alcove Press paperback, ISBN 9781639109753. Current publisher and Bookshop records show336pages; older advance records show320.
Four supported core judgments cover85% of the quality weighting. The provisional assessment leaves ending and reread unscored and excludes heat.
For another conflict between writers and literary expectations, in a lakeside setting rather than a graduate workshop.
For book-industry friction and a heroine whose work matters, with editorial careers instead of an assessed joint manuscript.
For competitive adult banter in an office. Its workplace contest offers a different setting and source of friction.
The academic rivals collection includes this book among other choices. Compare those options if its premise appeals but a limitation gives you pause. The Academic rivals-to-lovers guide explains the surrounding reading route and what to check before choosing.
A selective recommendation for romance readers who enjoy combative writers revealing themselves through a shared manuscript. The book-within-a-book offers a strong hook, but exaggerated hostility and the later romantic rupture are material limitations. Best for writing workshops, reluctant collaboration and a defense of romance as a genre. Approach cautiously if you need emotionally restrained protagonists, believable classroom conduct or a relationship without a third-act breakup.
Libro.fm when this balance matches what you want to read.
Checked 2026-10-11. The How this assessment was researched preserves attributions and research limits. Unknown details do not establish absence. Purchasing links use our account.