The Romantic Agenda Review: A Flirtatious Ace Heroine Finds a Patient Listener
Joy is thirty, asexual and secretly in love with her best friend Malcolm. A weekend away introduces Fox, whose fake-dating proposal creates an unexpected alternative to waiting for Malcolm. Publisher
Alicia finds the outwardly grumpy Fox a patient listener beside flirtatious, thoughtful Joy. This is a useful grumpy sunshine choice for readers drawn to attention and emotional recognition. Alicia
Authentic published cover of The Romantic Agenda by Claire Kann.
The verdict
Choose it for a confident ace heroine and a reserved, attentive partner; the longstanding attachment takes considerable emotional space.
★★★★★★★★★★Provisional Eikna score: 3.7/5. Four core dimensions cover 85% of the quality weight. Ending satisfaction and reread appeal remain unscored; heat is excluded. Researched editorial assessment; no firsthand reading claimed. Evidence confidence: moderate.
Spice, ending and series
Is The Romantic Agenda spicy?
A numeric heat level has not been established. Read the review’s heat and content discussion for attributed descriptions before choosing. An unknown level is not a closed-door or no-spice promise.
The romantic outcome is not established in this summary. A romance label does not independently confirm an ending. Consult the discussion before choosing if closure is essential.
For the difference between romantic commitment and wider plot closure, compare HEA, HFN and cliffhangers.
Can I read it on its own?
Standalone or continuing-series status is not established in this summary. Read the existing format and series guidance for any available context; do not assume a missing series entry means the book stands alone.
The series-order guide explains what to check when a complete romance belongs to a connected world.
Book and edition facts
Identity facts and explicit research limits
Title
The Romantic Agenda
Author
Claire Kann
Inspected edition
Berkley
Publication scope
12 April 2022
ISBN-13
9780593336632
Edition page count
336 pages
The author or publisher evidence identifies the work. Publication dates refer to the stated edition or release scope, not automatically the first appearance of the story. Unknown identifiers and formats are left open.
Fake dating exposes a neglected possibility
Joy joins a trip with the friend she loves and his new girlfriend. Fox offers pretend romance to make that friend jealous. Publisher
The interesting choice is whether being properly noticed can matter more than finally winning an old attachment. The premise offers that comparison directly.
A listener can remain reserved
Alicia values Fox’s patience and Joy’s thoughtful openness as much as their quick exchanges. Alicia
Choose this contrast if you want warmth expressed through attention. A quiet partner need not acquire a louder personality to become emotionally present.
Asexuality belongs within the love story
Stevie appreciates that Joy’s asexuality is not presented as brokenness and that her enjoyment of fashion and her body has its own place. Stevie
That makes the heroine’s identity part of her perspective rather than an obstacle a lover is expected to cure. Asexuality alone does not specify scene-level sexual content.
The old attachment competes for emotional space
Publishers Weekly finds Joy’s bond with Fox less intense than her devotion to Malcolm. Pw
Stevie also objects to how negatively the existing love interest comes across. Stevie
Readers wanting the eventual couple to dominate every emotional beat may need patience with the detour through longstanding loyalty.
The story includes unequal demands within a friendship and workplace relationship. Stevie Jealousy and disputed emotional priorities shape the romantic conflict; this is not an exhaustive content checklist.
Who should consider it
For readers who want asexual representation, fake dating and a quiet partner who takes a warmer heroine seriously.
What the contrasting responses mean
Alicia finds wit and emotional openness especially rewarding. Alicia Publishers Weekly values the ace perspective but wants more intensity in the new relationship. Pw Stevie likes Joy and Fox while resisting Malcolm’s portrayal. Stevie
Format, series and purchase guidance
The inspected primary description presents Joy and Fox’s own central romance; no required reading order is established.
A direct US product edition has not been verified. The Amazon link is a title-and-author search, with no specific format or availability promised. The paperback below matches the inspected Bookshop product. An audiobook destination remains unverified.
Quality scale: 1 substantial weaknesses; 2 weaknesses outweigh strengths; 3 mixed; 4 strengths outweigh limitations; 5 exceptional sustained strengths. Half points are allowed. Weights: romance 30%, characters 20%, writing 20%, emotional impact 15%, ending satisfaction 10%, reread appeal 5%. A provisional overall score divides the supported weighted sum by its supported weight and rounds once to one decimal. Heat is descriptive and excluded. These scores express the evidence-based judgment explained in this review.
The inspected material does not establish scene frequency or detail. Numeric heat and sexual-content classification remain unknown.
Intensity is not a measure of literary quality.
Unknown frequency is not evidence of absence.
Numeric heat remains unknown.
Ending satisfaction
Outcome not independently established
Formal outcome: UNKNOWN.
A favorable verdict does not establish the precise ending.
Genre expectations alone are insufficient evidence.
Ending satisfaction remains null.
Reread appeal
No editorial rereading assessment
This review has no editorial rereading notes.
An independent reader may revisit a book for different reasons.
A first-reading reaction does not determine durability.
Reread appeal remains null.
Questions before choosing
Why is it included as grumpy sunshine?
Alicia describes Fox as initially grumpy and disinterested but patient, while Joy is openly flirtatious, witty and thoughtful; her openness encourages his defenses to soften. Alicia
Is the sunshine character always happy?
No. The label describes a contrasting way of engaging with others; it does not erase grief, boundaries, or uncertainty.
Are these firsthand editorial scores?
No. This assessment compares named criticism. Ending satisfaction and reread appeal remain unscored.
Choose it for a confident ace heroine and a reserved, attentive partner; the longstanding attachment takes considerable emotional space. For readers who want asexual representation, fake dating and a quiet partner who takes a warmer heroine seriously.
Berkley / Penguin Random House. Inspected for this assessment; source URLs and lineage are retained in the local evidence record.
Publishers Weekly. Inspected for this assessment; source URLs and lineage are retained in the local evidence record.
A Kernel of Nonsense / Alicia. Inspected for this assessment; source URLs and lineage are retained in the local evidence record.
The Good, the Bad and the Unread / Stevie. Inspected for this assessment; source URLs and lineage are retained in the local evidence record.
Checked October 6, 2026. The How this assessment was researched preserves attributions and research limits. Unknown details do not establish absence. Purchasing links use our account.
As an Amazon Associate, Eikna Romance earns from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.
The love-triangle romance reading collection explains the attachment evidence and relationship context for this choice and compares it with other reviewed books.