Overall ★★★★☆ 3.6/5
- ✓ 3.90 Goodreads average, about 700,000 ratings
- ✓ Below The Love Hypothesis at 4.09
- ✓ Starred Booklist review, warm Publishers Weekly
- ✓ Recycled formula dominates the criticism
This review contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, Eikna Romance earns from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.
Verdict: A warm, funny STEM rivals romance with a hero readers fall for fast, held back by a miscommunication plot that runs past the halfway mark and a late sabotage thriller that a good share of readers call forced.
Best for: Readers who loved The Love Hypothesis and want the same recipe in a new lab, who enjoy a heroine who talks too much and a hero who says too little, and who can forgive a formula they can see coming from the first chapter.
Heat level: ★★★★☆ (4/5, explicit, per the author's own content warnings, but brief: readers count about three scenes, all in the back half; romance.io's band could not be confirmed)
Rating: ★★★★☆ (3.6/5, a 3.90 Goodreads average across about 700,000 ratings, pulled down because the most common complaints, a recycled Love Hypothesis formula and a villain subplot that turns the ending into a thriller, come from fans as well as critics)
Tropes: Academic rivals to lovers, Grumpy sunshine, Forced proximity at work, Secret online pen pal, Pining hero, Women in STEM, Height difference, Misunderstood history, Workplace sabotage.
Love on the Brain is Ali Hazelwood's second adult novel and a standalone contemporary STEM romantic comedy set at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, where neuroscientist Bee Königswasser finally lands the job she has wanted all her life, co-leading a neuroengineering project for astronauts, only to learn that her partner on it is Levi Ward, the engineer who made it plain in graduate school that he couldn't stand her.
The numbers are strong and a notch lower than Hazelwood's best. Goodreads shows a 3.90 average from about 700,000 ratings and about 85,000 written reviews, against 4.09 for The Love Hypothesis and 4.08 for Love, Theoretically. Berkley published it on August 23, 2022, at 368 pages, and Publishers Weekly and Booklist (with a star) both reviewed it warmly. Readers agree on Levi and on the banter. They split on whether this is the same book as Hazelwood's debut with a new lab coat, and that split is what to understand before you start.
This is a workplace romance about two people who misread each other years ago and have to share an office now. Bee is loud, purple haired and fixated on Marie Curie, and she vents about work through an anonymous Twitter account. Levi is enormous, quiet and, as far as Bee can tell, still annoyed by her existence. The comedy comes from her running commentary and his unreadable silences, and the romance comes from the reader working out well before Bee does that his silences mean something else.
Around the romance sit two other threads. One is about being a woman in a building full of men who explain her own field to her, and reviewers from Bookreporter to The Daily Texan single it out. The other is a sabotage plot inside the project, which pulls the last act toward suspense. How you feel about that second thread decides a lot of what you'll think of the ending.
Bee Königswasser is a 28-year-old neuroscientist at the National Institutes of Health, and she has a habit of measuring her life against Marie Curie's. So when NASA picks her to co-lead BLINK, a neuroengineering project building a helmet to help astronauts perform better on spacewalks, it is the closest she has come to a Curie moment. She packs up for Houston ready to prove she belongs.
Then she meets her co-lead. Levi Ward is the NASA engineer she knew in graduate school, the one who seemed to dislike her on sight and never bothered to hide it. He is still very tall and still very hard to read, and sharing a project with him looks set to be as uncomfortable as sharing a lab once was. Bee does what she has always done with frustration: she logs on to her anonymous Marie Curie account and complains to the internet, where one witty stranger keeps answering.
The longer she works beside Levi, the less the old story holds up. Levi turns out to be kinder than the man she remembers, and the history she has been carrying since grad school starts to look like a misreading. Meanwhile something on BLINK keeps going wrong, in ways that look less like bad luck and more like someone wants the project to fail.
Levi is the reason this book works, and readers say so in review after review. Hazelwood writes him almost entirely from the outside, through Bee's narration, so his feelings show up in small acts and looks that she keeps misreading. The pleasure is dramatic irony. You can tell what he feels long before Bee can, and the Goodreads reviews that call him thoughtful and attentive are describing exactly that gap.
We may earn a commission from purchases through our links, at no extra cost to you.
The second strength is Bee. Her narration is quick and self-mocking, she loves her work without apology, and her complaints about being the only woman in the room are the parts reviewers quote back. The Bookish Libra calls her flat out hilarious; Bookreporter praises the book's insight into being one of the few women at a place like NASA. When the jokes land, they land because Bee is the one telling them.
Where it struggles is the formula, and that's the most common complaint by some distance. Goodreads reviewers and bloggers alike point out that the quirky small heroine, the huge brooding hero and the long misunderstanding all repeat The Love Hypothesis, down to the height descriptions, and a 1.5-star review at Overflowing Shelf says it follows the earlier book almost exactly. Behind that come the secondary problems. Goodreads reviewers say the leads don't really talk until about 55 percent of the way in, a 5-star WordPress reviewer still admits to wanting to shout at them to tell the truth, and Bookreporter notes that the misunderstandings are broadcast well before they resolve.
The ending is the other fault line. The sabotage plot turns into a suspense finale, and the author's own content warnings flag guns and danger. The Bookish Libra docked half a star for it as unnecessary, Overflowing Shelf called the climax overdramatic and Flowering Pages found the ending short on emotional closure. Readers who came for a rom-com get a thriller beat they didn't sign up for.
Reset one expectation before you start. The covers and the comparisons sell a rivals-to-lovers romance, but Levi isn't much of a rival, and Hazelwood isn't hiding that. If you want real antagonism and a fight in every scene, this will feel soft. If you want a pining hero and a heroine who is the last to know, that's the book, and the slow realisation is the point.
Several readers who found The Love Hypothesis uneven like this one more. A Literary Escape gave it 4 stars and found the workplace premise less awkward than fake dating and the hero less of a jerk, which is a fair summary of what the book improves on even as it repeats the shape.
Our honest note: A charming hero and a funny heroine in a story you've read before, with an ending that swerves into a thriller it didn't need. Read it if The Love Hypothesis left you wanting more of the same; start with Love, Theoretically if the sameness is what worries you.
| Element | In Love on the Brain |
|---|---|
| Central relationship | Bee Königswasser, an NIH neuroscientist, and Levi Ward, a NASA engineer and her graduate school nemesis |
| Core tropes | Academic rivals to lovers, grumpy sunshine, secret online pen pal, pining hero, workplace forced proximity |
| Setting | NASA's Johnson Space Center, Houston, on a neuroengineering project called BLINK |
| Heat level | 4/5, explicit but sparse; readers count about three scenes, late in the book |
| Series | Standalone; it shares Hazelwood's STEM academia world, but nothing from her other books is needed |
| Content notes | Past parental death in a car accident, past death of a friend while climbing, a child's seizure disorder, workplace sexism and alluded sexual harassment, guns and danger, a past betrayal by an ex and a friend, explicit sex, profanity |
Explicit, but there isn't much of it. Hazelwood's own content warnings list explicit sexual content, and Goodreads reviewers count three sex scenes, all after a long build of tension. The Everygirl's guide to her books rates it 2 of 5 for spice and calls the scenes mild, while Booktopia's reviewer calls it very spicy. We put it at 4: when the door opens, the scenes are on the page in detail, but you wait a long time, and the first half runs on glances and near misses.
The scenes divide readers more than the amount does. A 5-star WordPress review calls them addictively good. Overflowing Shelf found them cringeworthy, and Goodreads reviewers say some of the dialogue in bed echoes The Love Hypothesis closely enough to notice. If you liked the tone of the scenes in the debut, you'll like these; if they made you wince, expect more of the same.
You'll likely love it if: you loved Adam and Olive and want another giant, quiet hero who has been gone on the heroine for years, you like a workplace setting with real science in it, and you enjoy being ahead of the narrator.
You may want to skip it if: you found The Love Hypothesis formulaic, long misunderstandings make you want to throw the book, or you want your rom-com to stay a rom-com through the final chapter.
In short: a sweet, funny second helping of the Hazelwood formula, best for fans and weakest for anyone hoping she'd try something new.
The conversation around Love on the Brain is still the one that started in August 2022: is this a better version of The Love Hypothesis or the same book again. It arrived as the follow-up to a debut that had become a word-of-mouth hit, and Berkley sold it as a new STEMinist rom-com from the same author. Trade reviewers were warm, with Publishers Weekly predicting it would win Hazelwood even more fans. Since then her catalogue has grown, and in 2026 the book is usually discussed as one entry in a ranking of her novels, with readers' guides such as The Everygirl's placing Love, Theoretically above it. We could not open Reddit threads, StoryGraph or romance.io for this review, so the reader discussion here comes from Goodreads, Audible, blogs and trade reviews.
Why readers love it: Readers love Levi first and Bee second. The pining is what fans describe most often: a hero whose feelings are visible to everyone but the heroine, written so that rereaders can spot the clues the second time. Bee's voice is the close second, along with the book's take on sexism in science, which reviewers from Under the Covers to Booktopia name as a reason the book matters to them. The You've Got Mail style pen pal thread gets regular praise too, and Goodreads reviewers keep calling it a fast, addictive read.
What readers argue about and complain about: The complaint is sameness. Goodreads reviewers list the near-identical archetypes, tropes and height descriptions, Audible listeners call it predictable next to the debut, and Overflowing Shelf, at 1.5 stars, says it follows the earlier book's formula almost exactly and also counts more than 630 italicised words. The second complaint is miscommunication, which a WordPress reviewer who otherwise gave it 5 stars still raises. The third is the sabotage plot, called forced by Goodreads reviewers and unnecessary by The Bookish Libra. A smaller group, including A Literary Escape, finds Bee's generalisations about men repetitive. Not everyone agrees on the formula: the same 5-star reviewer saw the similarities and still preferred this book.
The standalone question worth asking first: This is a standalone. Bee and Levi get a complete ending, there's no cliffhanger, and The Everygirl's guide notes that any links to Hazelwood's other books are minor and not needed. That makes the real question which Hazelwood to read next. The Love Hypothesis, her debut, has a 4.09 Goodreads average from about 2.2 million ratings. Love, Theoretically, the next adult STEM standalone, sits at 4.08 from about 749,000 ratings and is the one guides tend to rank highest. If this book left you happy but wanting more variety, that's where to go.
Yes, but in short bursts. The author's content warnings list explicit sexual content, and readers count about three scenes, all in the back half. We score it 4 out of 5 for explicitness, not for volume.
No. It's a standalone with new leads, Bee and Levi, and a NASA setting. It shares Hazelwood's STEM academia style, but you can read it first.
Goodreads readers rate it lower, 3.90 against 4.09. Some readers prefer it for a kinder hero and a less awkward premise; others find it too close to the debut's formula.
Yes. Bee is the talkative, upbeat lead and Levi the quiet, unreadable one. It's sold as enemies to lovers, but readers find Levi much less hostile than Bee believes.
Yes. Bee and Levi end together with no cliffhanger, though the last act brings in a suspense plot with guns and danger that some readers found jarring.
For the same author's strongest reader scores, go to Love, Theoretically, another academic rivals story that guides often rank as her best. For the debut this one gets compared to, read The Love Hypothesis. And for office rivals with more bite and real hostility, try The Hating Game.
Browse more in grumpy sunshine romance, enemies to lovers romance and romantic comedy.
Love on the Brain sets out to repeat Hazelwood's debut in a new lab, and it repeats the strengths along with the habits. What works: Levi's pining, Bee's voice and the book's eye for sexism in science. What doesn't: a formula many readers can map onto The Love Hypothesis, misunderstandings that run past the halfway mark and a sabotage finale that turns a rom-com into a thriller. If you came for more of the same, you'll get it, warmly done. If you wanted Hazelwood to stretch, read Love, Theoretically instead.
On the Eikna scale, Love on the Brain ranks as a dependable mid-catalogue Hazelwood, strongest in its pining hero and funny heroine, constrained by a familiar formula and a forced suspense ending, and best approached as a comfort reread for fans rather than a first Hazelwood.
Eight dimensions, each scored out of 5 from the reader and critic evidence above. Overall is anchored on the reader ratings and adjusted for how much the recurring complaints cost the reading experience. Heat describes how explicit the book is; it is not a quality judgement. Every line marked ✓ is a checked finding, including the limits. How we assess books.
Checked October 6, 2026. Ratings and counts change; the numbers above are as of that date.
Affiliate disclosure: Eikna Romance is a participant in the Amazon Associates Program. If you buy through a link on this page we may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you.