eikna romance
Menu

The Ex Talk Review: Fake Exes, Radio Chemistry and Gentler Workplace Hostility

Shay Goldstein has built her life around a Seattle public-radio station. Dominic Yun’s arrival brings professional friction, then an uncomfortable proposal: the two colleagues must pretend they used to date and offer relationship advice together on air. Losing their jobs is the alternative. Penguin Random House / Berkley

The premise promises enemies to lovers, but Romantic Parvenu finds a gentler form of dislike that fades early. Read this for a workplace romance in which performance turns into tenderness, rather than a prolonged feud. The public lie gives an otherwise warm courtship a real professional complication. Romantic Parvenu

Original thematic romance artwork for The Ex Talk
Original thematic artwork; not a published cover or a verified scene.

The verdict

Recommended for witty radio chemistry, a tender workplace romance and characters whose grief and insecurity matter beyond the flirtation. The hostility is comparatively gentle; the invented breakup and professional deception require some tolerance.

Provisional Eikna score: 4.0/5. Four core dimensions cover 85% of the quality weight. Ending satisfaction and reread appeal remain unscored; heat is excluded. Researched editorial assessment; no firsthand reading claimed. Evidence confidence: moderate.

Spice, ending and series

Is The Ex Talk spicy?

A numeric heat level has not been established. Read the review’s heat and content discussion for attributed descriptions before choosing. An unknown level is not a closed-door or no-spice promise.

The heat-level guide explains detail and frequency; the glossary entry for spice separates sexual content from quality.

Does it have a happy ending?

The romantic outcome is not established in this summary. A romance label does not independently confirm an ending. Consult the discussion before choosing if closure is essential.

For the difference between romantic commitment and wider plot closure, compare HEA, HFN and cliffhangers.

Can I read it on its own?

Standalone or continuing-series status is not established in this summary. Read the existing format and series guidance for any available context; do not assume a missing series entry means the book stands alone.

The series-order guide explains what to check when a complete romance belongs to a connected world.

Book and edition facts

Identity facts and explicit research limits
TitleThe Ex Talk
AuthorRachel Lynn Solomon
Inspected editionBerkley · paperback
Publication scopeJanuary 26, 2021 · inspected US paperback
ISBN-139780593200124
Edition page count352 pages

The Penguin Random House / Berkley identifies the work. Publication dates refer to the stated edition or release scope, not automatically the first appearance of the story. Unknown identifiers and formats are left open.

Fake exes change the familiar fake-dating bargain

The show depends on presenting an invented shared history as genuine advice. As the audience grows, the lie becomes harder to contain. Penguin Random House / Berkley

The attraction has to develop inside that performance. If you enjoy romantic cooperation that creates practical trouble, the premise offers something more specific than simply sharing an office. Readers who find deception exhausting may want a romance with less professional risk.

Why the chemistry has support beyond the synopsis

Publishers Weekly praises the on-air banter and transition from rivalry to attraction. It connects private insecurities with the relationship rather than treating the show as the entire story. Publishers Weekly

Kirkus finds the dialogue witty and Dominic unusually emotionally open. That supports a recommendation for warmth, not only sharp exchanges. Kirkus Reviews

The heroine’s perspective shapes how you meet Dominic

Romantic Parvenu values the single-heroine narration: Dominic’s feelings must emerge through his behavior, not direct access to his thoughts. Romantic Parvenu

PopTheButterfly enjoys the writing and character development but does not find Dominic appealing. The short objection is a useful contrary preference; it does not establish a broad failure of characterization. PopTheButterfly Reads

Adult grief and friendship give the romance context

Kirkus connects Shay’s radio ambition with grief for her father and praises the surrounding friends, family and colleagues. Kirkus Reviews

Romantic Parvenu highlights ordinary adult concerns around housing, friendship and work. Those details may make the niche radio setting more accessible even if broadcasting is not your interest. Romantic Parvenu

Heat and content notes

Kirkus describes steamy tension; PopTheButterfly also reports sexual content. This is an adult sexual-content choice, not a verified closed-door romance. Our numeric heat scale and scene frequency remain unassigned. Kirkus Reviews

Reported reader considerations include grief, death, language, misogyny and sexual content. PopTheButterfly Reads Romantic Parvenu describes a coercive, misogynistic boss. Professional pressure and the central lie may also affect your enjoyment; this is not an exhaustive warning list. Romantic Parvenu

Who should consider it

A good fit if you want flirtation grounded in jobs, insecurity and adult connection. Pass if your priority is sustained mutual hatred, or if pretending to be exes on a supposedly truthful radio show would overshadow the romantic appeal for you.

What the contrasting responses mean

PW finds the couple easy to support. Publishers Weekly A contrasting blogger enjoys much of the book but dislikes the romantic hero and the trope framing. PopTheButterfly Reads Those observations can coexist: appealing craft does not guarantee attraction to a particular lead. We use the disagreement to explain fit, not to average their ratings.

Format, series and purchase guidance

PopTheButterfly labels it a standalone. No continuing-couple commitment is established by this research. An explicit HEA or HFN ending classification remains unverified, even though checked criticism reports a satisfying romantic experience. PopTheButterfly Reads

A direct US product edition has not been verified. The Amazon link is a title-and-author search, with no specific format or availability promised. A verified Bookshop or Libro edition link is not yet available for this review.

We may earn a commission from purchases through our links, at no extra cost to you. Search Amazon for the title and author.

Seven-dimension evidence scorecard

Quality scale: 1 substantial weaknesses; 2 weaknesses outweigh strengths; 3 mixed; 4 strengths outweigh limitations; 5 exceptional sustained strengths. Half points are allowed. Weights: romance 30%, characters 20%, writing 20%, emotional impact 15%, ending satisfaction 10%, reread appeal 5%. A provisional overall score divides the supported weighted sum by its supported weight and rounds once to one decimal. Heat is descriptive and excluded. These scores express the evidence-based judgment explained in this review.

Romance

Persuasive chemistry, softer antagonism

Provisional dimension score: 4/5.

Characters

Insecurities give the leads dimension

Provisional dimension score: 4/5.

Writing

Strong dialogue with a purposeful narrative choice

Provisional dimension score: 4/5.

Emotional impact

Tenderness supported by several checked responses

Provisional dimension score: 4/5.

  • Kirkus regards the romance as uplifting. Kirkus Reviews
  • Private insecurities lend the comedy personal stakes. Publishers Weekly
  • Adult friendships and work broaden the setting. Romantic Parvenu
  • Our score is an editorial judgment about those findings, not a promise about your response.

Heat

Sexual content reported; level held

  • Kirkus reports steamy romantic tension. Kirkus Reviews
  • A blogger explicitly lists sexual content. PopTheButterfly Reads
  • No independently checked scene-frequency measure is available.
  • Descriptive heat is excluded from the quality score.

Ending satisfaction

Formal ending classification unknown

  • Romantic Parvenu reports satisfaction. Romantic Parvenu
  • That wording does not by itself establish HEA or HFN.
  • No numeric satisfaction score is assigned.
  • The lack of classification is uncertainty, not a claim of an unhappy ending.

Reread appeal

Not assessed

  • No inspected account here establishes repeated reading.
  • Knowing the deception may change expectations on a revisit, but that is untested.
  • Praise for dialogue is not evidence of a reread.
  • The unassessed dimension remains null.

Questions before choosing

Are the leads actually exes?

No. They are colleagues pretending to have a romantic history for a radio show. The invented past becomes complicated by genuine attraction. Penguin Random House / Berkley

Is this a harsh enemies-to-lovers romance?

Checked criticism describes relatively mild irritation rather than enduring hatred. Consider it a gentler workplace version, with the professional lie supplying much of the pressure.

Is it a standalone with a verified happy ending?

A checked blogger calls it standalone. Our research has not established an explicit HEA or HFN classification; positive romantic verdicts are not substitutes for that evidence.

Three books worth comparing

Follow the discovery route

The enemies-to-lovers guide includes this book among other choices. Compare those options if its premise appeals but a limitation gives you pause. The Romance discovery guide explains the surrounding reading route and what to check before choosing.

Final recommendation

Recommended for witty radio chemistry, a tender workplace romance and characters whose grief and insecurity matter beyond the flirtation. The hostility is comparatively gentle; the invented breakup and professional deception require some tolerance. A good fit if you want flirtation grounded in jobs, insecurity and adult connection. Pass if your priority is sustained mutual hatred, or if pretending to be exes on a supposedly truthful radio show would overshadow the romantic appeal for you.

Search Amazon for the title and author when this balance matches what you want to read.

Sources and assessment limits

  1. Penguin Random House / Berkley. Inspected for this assessment; source URLs and lineage are retained in the local evidence record.
  2. Kirkus Reviews. Inspected for this assessment; source URLs and lineage are retained in the local evidence record.
  3. Publishers Weekly. Inspected for this assessment; source URLs and lineage are retained in the local evidence record.
  4. Romantic Parvenu. Inspected for this assessment; source URLs and lineage are retained in the local evidence record.
  5. PopTheButterfly Reads. Inspected for this assessment; source URLs and lineage are retained in the local evidence record.

Checked October 6, 2026. The How this assessment was researched preserves attributions and research limits. Unknown details do not establish absence. Purchasing links use our account.

As an Amazon Associate, Eikna Romance earns from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

Why this book is in our contemporary collection

Kirkus Reviews — The Ex Talk: The exact-title review lists Contemporary Romance among its categories. Classification verified; checked 2026-10-07.

Berkley — The Ex Talk: Radio producer Shay clashes with new colleague Dominic over his confidence in his expertise. Their station puts them together as hosts who pretend to be former romantic partners; the invented breakup becomes complicated by real attraction. Opposition-to-romance mechanism verified; checked 2026-10-07.

The contemporary enemies-to-lovers collection compares this arrangement with workplace rivalry, comic revenge, mistaken impressions and old relationship damage, so you can choose the particular relationship opposition you want to read about.